I’m sure several of you have seen the above quote from Penn Jillette before, as it’s
been making the rounds. Before I say anything further, I want to make it clear
that, by and large, I agree with the general sentiment provided here. If compassion
is your concern, forcing people to help others does not display this quality in
any way. Also, anyone who portrays themselves as open hearted when crusading
for this type of government generated aid while refusing to help people they
come across every day is a douchebag. I’m on board there.
But that is also the point where I jump the train.
My first issue is with the idea presented here lies in equating
making people pay for something via taxes with robbing them at gunpoint . This
is what we, in the business of words, refer to as hyperbole designed to get
attention. I have never seen, nor heard of a situation where someone was shot
for refusing to pay their taxes. Yes, you may go to jail (though the process
for reaching that point is a bit drawn out even for the likes of Al Capone),
but you will not get shot. There is a difference and I’m a bit sick of anti-tax
polemics using such extreme language.
Next up is the term compassionate, which is fundamentally
selfish in this case. It is related to how you feel about yourself or how
others view you. It has nothing to do with actually helping anyone. I am not in
any way concerned with feeling compassionate or helping someone else to achieve
that inward state of bliss. I don't care about getting "moral credit". I would much rather get shit done.
That distinction is a bit of a nit-pick, but it’s an
important one because of the next flaw I see: the idea of only helping people
within your reach. Yes, if there is someone right next to you that needs help
which you are able to provide, then I highly suggest doing so. The problem is
that not everyone that needs assistance is within your immediate vicinity and
that buffer of space tends to make even the cuddliest of us rather selfish and
short sighted. To a certain extent, we can’t help not being able to
intrinsically see those outside our particular monkeyspheres as non-entities
with no importance or value. That is where we get people demanding that all
jobs stay within our specific country or county, even though most of us would
readily admit that factory workers in China deserve the ability to feed themselves
and their families just as much as we do.
That is where force comes in. Most of us (notice I am
including myself in this group) have to forced or coerced to help others even
in the most basic of ways that assist ourselves as much as other people. This
is because most of us are selfish and lazy. It isn’t nice to hear, but it’s
true. Sometimes, when the need is high enough, it is necessary and justifiable to
force people.
Of course, force is not compassionate, it is the opposite of
compassionate. Also, the use of it must be husbanded with great care or people
will get justifiably pissed off. However, when it comes to maintaining the
lives and livelihoods of human beings, I’m okay with not being compassionate.
And so, I shall hence forth reference Monkeyspheres endlessly until someone finally asks me what the fuck I am talking about -- and I shall expound.
ReplyDeleteI agree for the most part. But in the end, as we are discussing forcing people to be compassionate -- this never works, and there are always the pissed off ones -- but the bigger issue I have always thought that government (ie: you and me, sorta) has it's own "Monkeysphere", and that help rarely if ever actually makes it to the lazy people we are so fond of screaming about. All that money gets syphoned into this and that, and (much maligned) social welfare receives very little of it. So all of those people we seem to think are living large and having babies for bigger checks are still living on $70 a month + food stamps or, at a rate that would kill me, personally.
Monkeysphere is a marvelous term, is it not?
ReplyDelete